One last topic on the subject of archaeological evidence for the book of mormon that i want to talk about is horses. The lay mormon is told by the mormon church that archaeology continues to confirm the book of mormon, while mormon scholars, who actually study archaeology for a living, have something quite. All opinions, speakers and presenters represent and express their own individual opinions, and not necessarily the opinions of firm foundation, book of mormon evidence, or its employees, and no information or opinions represent the. Book of mormon central archaeological evidence for the. This site provides you with an overview of what the book of mormon claims from an archeological or historic viewpoint, and compares it to nonapologetic apologetic meaning speak to defend scientific and historical resources. The first myth we need to eliminate is that book of mormon archaeology existsif one is to study book of mormon archaeology, then one must have a corpus of data with which to deal. As always, i invite you to study the issues, evaluate what we know and what we dont. We testify that the book of mormon is a sacred historical record of real people. All opinions, speakers and presenters represent and express their own individual opinions, and not necessarily the opinions of firm foundation, book of mormon evidence, or its employees, and no information or opinions represent the church of jesus christ of latterday saints. Welcome to the book of mormon archaeological forum. Critics who contend the book of mormon has no archaeological evidence are simply uninformed. The most common belief of adherents is that promoted by joseph smith, who said he translated ancient golden plates inscribed by prophets. Join wayne on a book of mormon tour and see the archaeological discoveries of the nephites and jaredites. In the last chapter we saw that the bible is reliable, being textually pure and verifiably accurate in many places.
There is no archaeological evidence to support the use of wheeled vehicles in precolumbian mesoamerica. Direct archaeological evidence for the book of mormon. Undeniable archaeological evidence of the book of mormon in north america duration. The book of mormon tells of king noah being executed for crimes in a lengthy ceremony similar to the mayan execution ritual.
Therefore, the mormon can have confidence that the bible. Is there archaeological evidence for the book of mormon. If there is data supporting the texts, we can calculate whether the book of mormon should be considered to be based on fact or simply a good fiction. Is there evidence for the authenticity of the book of mormon. A combination of factors, including the evidence appearing at the right time, at the right place, and in the right relative distance to another site mentioned in the record, converge to make nahom strong archaeological evidence for the book. Anderson, personal writings of the book of mormon witnesses, in book of mormon authorship revisited. Many parts of ancient mesoamerica were not suitable for wheeled. Bpin the last part in this series, we saw that the bible is reliable, being textually pure and verifiably accurate in many places. If the resurrected savior, jesus christ, really did visited the book of. It testifies of his divinity and of the necessity for a redeemer. Evidence now supports the fact that these ancient people did have and use steel as recorded in the book of mormon. There are a number of words and phrases in the book of mormon that are anachronistictheir existence in the text of the book of mormon is at odds with known linguistic patterns or archaeological findings each of the anachronisms is a word, phrase, artifact, or other concept that critics, historians, archaeologists, or linguists believe did not exist in the americas during. Those who make claims that there is no archaeological evidence supporting the book of mormon are right in one respectwe dont know where the cities mentioned in the book of mormon are located.
When they say directly support, they typically mean that they are looking for a direct corroboration, such as the presence of the name nephi or zarahemla in association. Why are there not any archeological artifacts on ancient. Direct archaeological evidence for the book of mormon youtube. Two of the most prevalent claims for the book of mormon are, there is much archaeological proof to the book of mormon, and the american indians are descendants of israelites who came to america as described in the book of mormon. Archaeological, social, and cultural evidence, dvd rodney meldrum, 2008, sec. Oct 18, 2009 critics who contend the book of mormon has no archaeological evidence are simply uninformed. Book of mormon evidence streaming here subscription site with over 350 virtual expo videos. The probability of muhammad being correct about jesus is less than 2 chances in 1 billion based on archaeological evidence. The book of mormon teaches that the redemption of christ was planned before the world began, and the mayans likewise believed. Numerous scholars and archaeologists have unanimously concluded that there is absolutely no archaeological evidence for the book of mormon. Ritual sacrifice both human sacrifice and animal sacrifices occurred in ancient america. The mayan gods gathered under the tree of life to hold a council all the gods had taken part in the creation of the earth.
Archaeological evidence of the book of mormon latterday. Although historians and archaeologists consider the book to be an anachronistic invention of joseph smith, many members of the church of jesus christ of latterday saints lds church and other denominations. Undeniable archaeological evidence of the book of mormon in north america by lifey. Today we will talk about some common criticisms of the book of mormon around archaeological evidence that some say proves or disproves the truthfulness of the book of mormon. Archaeological and historical evidence where did the. Thus, it can be seen that archaeological evidence for the book of mormon which does exist, as will be discussed shortlydoes not constitute proof, nor does it translate into belief. The scientific legacy of a quest to prove the book of mormon. Mar 24, 2020 the book of mormon brings men to christ through two basic. This book the book of mormon must be either true of false. It conflicts with details in the book of mormon, contradicts the teaching of a long line of lds presidents and apostles, and in the end cannot produce a single piece of archaeological evidence that can be identified as nephite or jaredite a fact which byu professors such as hugh nibley, bruce w.
The book of mormon is said to have been written in a reformed egyptian characters, but no archaeological, linguistic, or other evidence of the use of egyptian writing in ancient america has been discovered. You may also view pages from the annotated book of mormon click here. Therefore, the mormon can have confidence that the bible is the word of god and that it can be accurately translated. In the paper revisiting sariah at elephantine, neal rappleye, a research project manager here at book of mormon central, explains that scholars have identified a jewish woman named. In fact, several mormon organizations have been founded. This, of course, is not to imply that there are no problems connected with biblical archaeology, or that archaeological evidence alone can prove the bible to be divinely inspired. In 1975, he submitted a paper to a symposium about book of mormon geography outlining the failure of archaeologists to find old world plants, animals, metals, and scripts in mesoamerica. Book of mormon evidence in american archaeology wayne may. Apr 28, 2017 nahom is a big book of mormon evidence that i respect location is right and the archaeological evidence is sound.
As far as the location of old world bountiful, its up in the air. Deanna draper buck, internal evidence of widespread literacy in the book of mormon, religious educator 10, no. Archaeological evidence for the book of mormon book of. Ancient american magazine explore the precolumbian americas with this quarterly publication. Nonmormon archaeologists speak on book of mormon evidence. The scientific search for nephite remains mormons in transition. Therefore, as things stand at the moment, current new world archaeological evidence tends to verify the claims made by the book of mormon. T he book of mormon is advertized by the church of jesus christ of latterday saints as another testament of jesus christ and specifically of the account of his supposed visit to the american continent the book of mormon, 3 nephi 11.
In this post i wanted to emphasize physical evidencesstuff you can touch, see, feel. The volume has long invited scrutiny from all branches of science. No arrangement of evidence, however skillfully ordered. Book of mormon central archaeological evidence for the book. Some early20th century mormons claimed various archaeological findings such as place.
No, not everything is archaeologically confirmed, any more than everything in any ancient document is. Though argument does not create conviction, lack of it destroys belief. I couldnt possibly cover every book of mormon correlation in one sitting. If the book of mormon is really a true history, then i would think that there should be some archaeological evidence that supports the truthfulness of those historical events. If a socalled holy book is not a myth, then we will find that the names of cities, people, and other unique details will be supported by archaeological evidence. Preearth life similar to mormon teachings, mesoamericans believed gods existed before the world was created. Non mormon archaeologists speak on book of mormon evidence. Honestly, i feel like looking for archaeological evidence of the book of mormon is like looking for a needle in a field. The book of mormon mentions the presence of chariots in three instances, in two instances both around 90 bc at the same location inferring them as a mode of transportation. A journal of latterday saint faith and scholarship.
His library research spurred his first hunt for archaeological evidence. Smith claimed the angel moroni, a prophet in the book of mormon. Welcome to rlatterdaysaints a gathering place for those supporting or investigating the church of jesus christ of latterday saints and its members. Five compelling archeological evidences for the book of mormon. The purpose of the book of mormon is to convince the world that jesus is the christ, our lord and redeemer. Intellectual evidence of book of mormon authenticity is an issue worthy of careful consideration. This video will help you understand that the foundation of the lds faith is built upon myth.
The book of mormon describes migrations of people from the middle east to central america, and further describes some features of their civilizations in the new world. Archaeological and historical evidence steel utilized as. According to the smithsonian institution, archaeological evidence shows that the western hemisphere was populated by east asian peoples migrating across the bering strait and rules out alternatives involving long sea voyages 23 as a significant contribution to new world settlement, as proposed by the book of mormon. There are several theories as to the origin of the book of mormon. Supporting evidences of the book of mormon are broadly identifiable. The type of faith mormons exhibit is the third type and is not the way god works as modeled throughout the bible. If the book of mormon is actually a novel, why would a protestant minister say there are multiple gods, etc. Rediscovering the book of mormon remnant through dna. While there is ample archaeological evidence to prove the authenticity of the bible in the middle east, the evidence to support the book of mormon is not there. Some archaeological evidences for the book of mormon. In fact, several mormon organizations have been founded in order to prove these very. Archaeologist uncovered a steel sword that was found near new city of jericho during the 1980s that dates back to the 7th century b.
Most adherents to the latter day saint movement view the book as a work of inspired scripture. Echoes and evidences of the book of mormon byu scholarsarchive. For most people, that isnt a big deal, but when you studied archaeology1 at a churchowned university, it surprises some. This sub is for fellowship and faithful belief in the restored gospel of jesus christ ephesians 2. See the references at the end of this page for details. How a mormon lawyer transformed archaeology in mexicoand. Although historians and archaeologists consider the book to be an anachronistic invention of joseph smith, many members of the church of jesus christ of latterday saints lds church and other denominations of the latter day saint movement believe that it. Too many historical and cultural references mightve undermined or watered down its spiritual objectives. The list of archaeological and historical claims of the book. Archaeologists, when examining ancient evidence, are working with a very fragmentary record. When they say directly support, they typically mean that they are looking for a direct corroboration, such as the presence of the name nephi or zarahemla in association with. New evidence for the book of mormon name sariah 1 nephi 2. Im not really interested in book of mormon archaeology.
If the resurrected savior, jesus christ, really did visited the book of mormon people in the americas. Book of mormon archaeology and anthropology byu studies. This volume features articles on archaeological and anthropological aspects of the book of mormon, such as the use of the wheel in ancient america, hagoth and the polynesian tradition, the mulekites, ancient writing in the americas, and the use of metal. The lamanite city jerusalem in the land of nephi was named by lehite migrants after the old world site from which their ancestors came alma 21. Dont expect proof for any religion or matter of faith, but yes, there are many issues that support the concept that the book of mormon is of ancient origin and not a silly fraud by joseph smith. As explored in this video, the location nahom in the book of mormon has been archaeologically confirmed. Archaeological science versus claims of the book of mormon. Deanna draper buck was a support specialist for seminaries and institutes of religion in louisville, kentucky when this was written. In dealing with archaeological and other evidences for the book of mormon, we must first realize that nearly all critical comments of scholars have been based on a common mormon misconception. Wayne may presents the supporting evidence for the heartland model, that the book of mormon nephites and jaredites lived in north america. I was baptized as a mormon 806 age 60, from a catholic background. Archaeological and historical evidence where did the book.
This compilation of groundbreaking book of mormon articles is selected from over fifty years of lds scholarship published by byu studies. To begin looking for archaeological evidence you have to know where to look. There is a powerful evidence of book of mormon authenticity found in helaman 3. People of all and any faiths are welcome here on the grounds of goodwill and faith. The book of mormon makes a handful of references to horses existing on the american continents in these ancient times.
Serious study of the book of mormon by latterday saints is flourishing today as never before. There is no archaeological evidence for the book of mormon. If we read the mormon book, we find that in mormon 6. It is a common claim by critics that there is absolutely no archaeological evidence to support the book of mormon. The book of mormon describes both within the time frame in accordance with the law of moses.
Chart showing the signs of the second coming in third nephi. If the book is accurate, archaeologists would expect to find numerous pieces of hard evidence in central america that confirm the presence of these societies. Among other errors, the book of mormon makes numerous claims about society in precolumbian north america which totally contradict the archaeological evidence. Archaeological evidence and the book of mormon fairmormon. It was written by prophets anciently, preserved, and translated in our era by the power of god as a tool to bring souls to christ. Jun 22, 2016 all opinions, speakers and presenters represent and express their own individual opinions, and not necessarily the opinions of firm foundation, book of mormon evidence, or its employees, and no information or opinions represent the church of jesus christ of latterday saints. Is the book of mormon authenticated by archaeology. The scientific search for nephite remains mormons in. The current suggestions are all logically placed along the dhofar coast in oman based on geography, but they dont have hard archaeological evidence like we. Why are there not any archeological artifacts on ancient world of book of mormon as there are on the bible. The list of archeological and historical claims of the book of mormon compared to nonapologetic evidence.
This is another in my series of article on challenging questions that missionaries will likely face. Why does the book of mormon talk of horses, metal, cows, etc when these did not come to new world until after 1492. There is no historical or archeological evidence to support the book of mormon. Oct 24, 2014 this video will help you understand that the foundation of the lds faith is built upon myth. Book of mormon thought false by lds memberarchaelogist. Underwater archaeology and the book of mormon in sorenson. Archaeology itself can be divided and subdivided into numerous disciplines.
582 315 1097 1396 959 1110 63 50 708 148 1336 1466 322 958 913 931 274 1202 61 753 633 1213 115 171 1482 451 789 481 476 1242 606 1528 584 321 898 773 1459 823 638 378 256 1070 1244 763 174